Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Alone in the South


Living in the South for the last 6 months has been a very interesting time in my life. I don't think I have ever been this alone before. Alone geographically, culturally, and personally. I didn’t feel this alone when I went to North Carolina for the summer to attend the American College Dance Festival at Duke University. I took part in the festival in order to pursue my dream of becoming a professional dancer at age 17. Even though I was interested and immersed in a new and difficult world, I remember aching for familiarity while I was there--I had never been away from my parents for such a long period of time before--and I kept trying to think of ways to break my leg so I could return back home. I didn’t feel this alone when I left the country for the first time for Ecuador at age 20 and couldn't imagine crossing national and cultural lines, and feared I might never see my parents again because this incredible distance between us was so difficult to imagine. I didn’t even feel this alone when I left my home-state at age 22 to follow the man I loved to the Pacific Northwest, not realizing that this move would mean that I was leaving the place that gave me roots, a place that I knew and cherished, and made me who I am, for a very long time. I did not realize at the time that the reason my parents cried when I left wasn't just because they were sad to see me go, but that they were remembering and even still realizing what similar moves in their lives had meant for them and their families, and what this might mean for ours.

What my move at age 22 meant for me is that life and adventures happened, and I moved from Alaska, to Oregon, back to Alaska, to Washington, and now to Florida. 7 Years have passed since then. My parents’ sadness and fears were not unfounded. Both my brother and I have been away from our roots for a long time. I am still very connected to my parents and to Minnesota as a place, and I return there several times a year and have had the luxury of going on extended visits most years that let me continue to know the place as it changes and to have an adult relationship with it as well as with my parents.

I moved from Seattle to Northern Florida about 6 months ago, to a town called Gainesville, home of the University of Florida. Who knows how I got here—it’s complicated, and I’m still trying to figure that story out. Before coming here, I never would have imagined myself living in Florida. But I have gone through culture shock—culture shock in general, Southern culture shock, and Florida culture shock, and have experienced some neat things while living here. Florida is much different that I ever would have thought. It is truly a beautiful place. In my mind’s eye I had always pictured Florida as a big sand bar essentially, with palm trees scattered here and there. But I live in North-Central Florida, where there is seemingly never-ending greenery and swamps, huge oak trees with Spanish moss hanging from their graceful branches, clear lagoons, springs, banana trees, tropical flowers, and more. It is an incredibly beautiful place--so amazingly biologically diverse--and I am thankful that I have had the chance to explore this part of the country.

Getting to know “the South” has been a real eye-opener. Different rules apply down here. People are less politically correct. Racism is less subtle, or silent. The relationships between Caucasians and African Americans are very different here in the South. There is more racial tension. The town of Gainesville is very segregated. I happen to live in one of the few “White” houses on the “Black” side of town, and so feel like I am contributing my part to the gentrification of Gainesville. At the same time, I am living in a unique neighborhood, and am experiencing things I have not experienced in depth before, such as being an outsider, racially and culturally. I have been an outsider before in my life—unable to fit in for various reasons, oftentimes due to cultural differences, and I have also experienced being an ethnic minority on “visits” into other cultures. However, these were just visits.

Growing up in Minnesota, my parents often referred to us as outsiders, because culturally, religiously, and politically we did not fit in with the majority of people living in central Minnesota. But here I am living alone in a neighborhood where I cannot pretend not to be an outsider. I am unable to blend in. I do not blend in at work either—people ask me every day, “Where are you from?” They cannot for the life of them, tell where my accent is from. I think my accent is going to be even more difficult to distinguish after living here, because I already confuse people with my Minnesota-Northwest accent. Now it will have a Southern twist as well, and people will no longer be able to understand me. I guess I will just have to resort to writing in order to communicate.

Another thing that I have noticed about the South and that lets me know I am living in a very different part of the country is that economic hardship seems more noticeable and extreme here. There is a great deal of poverty in Northern Florida, and in Gainesville in particular.

I have learned that it is a no-no to poke fun at Uber-Christians or make fun of “Jesus freaks” here in the South. I realized this right away. There was a cultural shift I had to make in terms of talking about religion. In the “atheistic” Northwest, people (even Christians) find humor in poking fun at “Jesus freaks”. It is a cultural attitude that does not exist in the same way here. It is the same with politics. I think I started to become comfortable in my liberal bubble living in both Olympia and Seattle, the two most progressive cities in Washington state. In both of those places, if you are a liberal, you can almost assume that when you talk with someone, you are talking to someone that holds at the very least, moderately liberal views politically and religiously. Here that is not the case. Even though Gainesville is known to be one of the most (if not the most) progressive cities in Florida, it is dangerous to assume that you are talking to someone who is a progressive thinker when it comes to politics, religion, and race. I guess this is a good lesson to learn—it is dangerous to assume that others might be thinking on the same plane as you are.

There is a part of the United States that I was very unfamiliar with before living here, and I feel like I am getting to know my country better for the first time, in both beautiful and ugly ways. I am getting to know myself better too. I have had the opportunity to travel a bit through the South while I’ve been here. I took a road trip to New Orleans, and another trip to Savannah Georgia, which were both really neat experiences and showed me a lot of the South that I hadn’t seen before as well. The incredible spirit of New Orleans and its fight for survival was truly touching to see after having visiting the city pre-Katrina, ten years ago. I saw that the place had gone through so much, and had truly been changed, but is amazingly resilient and more powerful because of what the people are still in the process of transcending. In Savannah I saw incredible history and architecture, and even though the city thrives mainly on tourism, I saw women dressed in their Sunday finest, with huge, old fashioned church bonnets with face netting and all. I saw neat and ancient cemeteries, and Haitian painters selling their art by the river.

Even the animals here in the South are foreign to me. But I love the creatures here—they are fascinating. I never get tired of seeing little tiny lizards scurry across the pavement as I walk. If I look closely at a tree, I am bound to see a lizard or chameleon doing its best to blend in with the bark and successfully looking beautiful. Then of course there are the big lizards, the alligators that I have had the luck to encounter more than once. They are truly unique and bizarre creatures, and I still can’t fathom that they are everywhere in Florida—even in the city ponds if you look closely. There are huge, mysterious, and lovely reptiles lurking beneath the surface. How fantastic. There are endless species of beautiful birds that I had never seen before living here. There are giant dragonflies, and countless bugs and spiders. There are snakes, armadillos, deer, wild horses, bison, coyotes, foxes and owls. I have seen and heard more owls living in Florida in 6 months than I have in my entire life. It’s pretty incredible.

I am having so many amazing experiences here. And yet I have never been this independent. I am alone to experience all of this. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing—it is just a new thing. In all of my other experiences, I either had a partner that was experiencing it with me, or I was on a “short” adventure, knowing that I would soon return to familiarity and people that I knew and loved. Here I feel like I am living in another country—the different time zones of my family members make it difficult to connect with them, along with our different work schedules. I have made some connections here, but making good friends takes time, and I have only been here for six months. I have been enjoying spending time alone—I have just never felt this alone—I am living in a foreign place, in a foreign culture, thousands of miles from my family and close friends. I am living in the lonely, strange, and beautiful South.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Hillary, Were You In This Campaign Just For You? By Caitlin Robertson


I had a telephone conversation with a good friend last night after having watched the second evening of the 2008 Democratic Convention. She brought up Hillary Clinton's speech, and spoke of how inspiring and uniting Clinton's speech was. Consequently, my friend was surprised and one could say slightly annoyed that I had any criticisms or skepticisms to share about the former presidential candidate's words and her genuineness in saying them.

I, like my friend, was very impressed with the last few minutes of Clinton's speech, as I thought she was finally able to stop talking about herself and her accomplishments and was able to focus on the people, the country and the need to unite in order to adequately confront the crises that the United States is facing. I was particularly moved by the inspirational quote by Harriet Tubman (centered on advice that she gave to slaves while helping them escape along the underground railroad) that Clinton included toward the end of her speech and I believe that the audience was truly moved by Clinton’s use of Tubman's words of wisdom:

If you hear the dogs, keep going.

If you see the torches in the woods, keep going.

If they're shouting after you, keep going.

Don't ever stop. Keep going.

If you want a taste of freedom, keep going.

Hillary made this quote relevant by adding her own words, "Even in the darkest of moments, ordinary Americans have found the faith to keep going". At this moment, I truly wanted to believe in the authenticity of Clinton’s speech, and to trust that she was truly trying to unite the Democratic Party for reasons that transcended her own personal power and political goals.

However, I am uncertain of whether or not Clinton was authentically "standing behind" Barack Obama in the beginning and middle of her speech. Clinton asked the audience toward the middle of her speech,

"I want you to ask yourselves: Were you in this campaign just for me? Or were you in it for that young Marine and others like him? Were you in it for that mom struggling with cancer while raising her kids? Were you in it for that boy and his mom surviving on the minimum wage? Were you in it for all the people in this country who feel invisible?"

From Her quote it seems as though Clinton was gracefully and stoically asking her supporters to transcend their allegiances to her and unite behind Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. But is this what Clinton really wanted? Or was her intention of the first half of her speech, which highlighted her accomplishments and her 35 years of hard work for the Democratic Party, including the 18 million cracks that she and her supporters have put in the glass ceiling, to reveal who the real presidential candidate should have been--herself?

It's not that I believe that Hillary Clinton should hide her accomplishments. I believe her achievements have been extraordinary, and she made an excellent candidate for the presidency. I believe that there should be a celebration of the amazing time in history that she has been a part of—and of how far Clinton has come in her quest to become the first woman president of the United States. Indeed, her incredible intelligence and prowess shows hope and promise and possibility for women and girls of all generations and the world. I myself, started out as a Hillary Clinton supporter and I believe that sexism stopped her from going further in her campaign for the presidency.

However, I don't believe that the democratic convention is the place that Clinton should be highlighting the qualities that she knows only reaffirm to her supporters that she is the candidate that should be running for president. Even though she directly asked her supporters to support Barack Obama, her words, nuanced delivery and passive aggressive tone said otherwise.

Clinton managed to get through her speech having appeared to build up Barack Obama but not really having done so--In her speech she said that America needs good leaders but never actually called Barack Obama a good leader. She did, however, manage to undermine Obama's leadership skills and experience with foreign policy, two things she criticized him for when she ran against him for the presidency when she said,

"Americans are also fortunate that Joe Biden will be at Barack Obama's side. He is a strong leader and a good man. He understands both the economic stresses here at home and the strategic challenges abroad. He is pragmatic, tough, and wise."

No one can refute that Hillary Clinton is skilled in delivery and rhetoric. How can one really call her out on the subtle undertones of her speech? Her defense could easily be that she was simply giving accolades to the Obamas and Bidens as a team. Throughout her speech, Clinton said things that she could easily argue were positive and supportive of Barack Obama, but could also be perceived as passive aggressive comments given her past criticisms of Obama such as, "And I can't wait to watch Barack Obama sign a health care plan into law that covers every single American. "

I realize that it has to be difficult to concede a presidential campaign, and maybe even especially so in Clinton's case, when there has been rampant sexism attempting and finally succeeding in squashing her ambitions of becoming president. But this does not give her the right to undermine Barack Obama in her speech at the democratic convention, no matter where her future political interests lie, and no matter how unjust it is that sexism has beleaguered her political aspirations of becoming president for the time being.

I also realize that like my friend, many, perhaps even the majority of people, will not view her speech as having passive aggressive tones. Many of the reviews and discussions I have seen or read of her speech thus far have raved about Clinton’s words and the message that she sent out to the country through them--that we need to unite behind Barack Obama in order to save the country from 4 more years of disaster. My friend said that she would prefer to continue to feel inspired and motivated by Clinton’s speech, and to just believe in its authenticity, rather than have it be jaded by my “overly critical” and “cynical” comments. I acknowledge that sometimes just believing in the authenticity of something is nice, and in politics, it seems that this chance to do so comes around altogether too rarely.

However, politics are interesting because of these different layers and nuances that people see, and I believe it is important that we recognize and listen to perspectives that are different from our own in order find or at least search for truth. Through Clinton’s speech, I believe that damage was done to Barack’s campaign, and to the Democratic Party, albeit in a subtle way. Hillary got the retribution she wanted, but at what cost? Perhaps we need to ask Hillary to ask herself, “Were you in this campaign just for you?”

*Read Clinton’s full speech, posted on August 26, 2008 at: http://www.truthout.org/article/hillary-rodham-clinton-were-you-in-it-just-for-me
And send me some thoughts please!